The Public Record Retriever Network
Welcome to the home page of PRRN—the Public Record Retrieval Network. PRRN is one of the largest
U.S. trade organizations representing professionals in the public record industry.
With more than 500 members in 45+ states who retrieve documents from local government agencies
in over 2,000 counties nationwide, PRRN Members are recognized as the nation's leaders in local
public record searching and document retrieval.
What Do PRRN Members Do?
Simply put, PRRN Members are professionals who visit government agencies on-site—such as local,
federal, and state courts or recorder's offices—to do name searches and/or obtain copies of file
documents. Retrievers are often hired in conjunction with the pre-employment screening,
investigations, lending, litigation, or for legal compliance (e.g., incorporations).
As recognized leaders in local public record searching and document retrieval, PRRN Members agree
to follow standards of professional conduct for local searching and document retrieval procedures
and to follow the highest standards of ethics and conduct in all their dealings with other members
and with clients. Click on the What is PRRN
tab above for more information.
For Information about joining PRRN
- click here
How Do I Find a PRRN Member?
The link below leads you to the Search Page. From here you can locate a PRRN Member by state and
county/parish and by the type of public record you need. You can also search by the company name.
November 06, 2014 - Latest Record Access Changes in Maine
The Maine Judicial Branch is in the process of implementing a new procedure for Civil and Criminal record requests. Walk-in requests for these searches at the individual courts eventually will no longer be available. The process for record searches at all courts/counties is being moved to the Judicial Branch Service Center in Lewiston, Maine. At this time, the Superior and District Courts in Aroostook, Knox, Lincoln, Penobscot, Piscataquis, Sagadahoc, Waldo, Washington and York. Cumberland Court is expected to be added to this list effective November 14, 2014. All courts will be incrementally brought into the program by the end of this year (2014). Court are now participating in the program. On October 15, 2014, pilot program will add the Biddeford District Court, York District Court, Penobscot County Superior Court, Bangor District Court, Lincoln District Court, Millinocket District Court, Newport District Court, Piscataquis County Superior Court, and the Dover-Foxcroft District Court. All courts will be incrementally brought into the program by the end of this year.
October 04, 2014 - Court Closure in Maine
Millinocket District Court was closed in October 2014. Cases are held at the District Court in Lincoln.
July 16, 2014 - Alameda (CA) Superior Court
The court recently decided it will no longer disclose records of dismissed criminal cases per Labor Code Section 432.7. However, the court also extended this policy to include non-employment investigative due diligence research (which is not specifically mention as part of 432.7). This means that for example private investigators performing litigation work for attorneys are now blocked from obtaining these documents.
July 10, 2014 - San Luis Obispo and Santa Cruz (CA) Superior Court Fee Issues
In San Luis Obispo affective Monday July 7, 2014. all searches are charged $15 per every 10 minutes of the clerk's time. The fee is based on the time needed to complete each submitted "list" - and not on a per name basis. Thus if 30 names are on a list and it take 40 minutes to complete - the fee is $60.00. If any list takes less than less than 10 minutes to research, then no fee is charged. All criminal record searches at these two courts must be performed by court personal. Note the San Luis Obispo Superior Court does have a public access terminal, but the court will only allow attorneys and the news media access to the terminal. The rest of the public is blocked.
The same policy has been in existence in Santa Cruz for some time.
Many court researchers and record users feel this policy is in onflict with the existing state law. Per California Government Code -GC 70627(c):